新聞媒體: RT @DrRJKavanagh: Why? A reason was not given, but it is worth noting that the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals was based on "reputational harm" that may be done to living relatives of the perpetrators and witnesses to the lynching. https://t.co/8OO9d78tid Pinterest POST "body": { "type": "url_verification", "token": "BOSI02pbHZtxIWax2s5gSxWw", "challenge": "XX7U4wCruq8O7qSKDFHqmgS3RnC9COV5bpRNS2yxXCTlrFtEDxYl"
attribution=setup_tool page_id="358575061279891">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="501468250236922">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="440173536047074">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="1842719562630681">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="1646128708931861">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="1691124714547647">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="1691124714547647">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="1691124714547647">
attribution=setup_tool page_id="161755170603642"
https://twcctz50.tumblr.com/post/186766196234/%E8%9B%8B%E9%BB%83%E6%B2%B9%E5%8D%B5%E7%A3%B7%E8%84%82
Pinterest
Open chat!
168551323706628 haonature.com 390929341005086 https://www.haonature.com
1971646449771329 twcctz50.blogspot.tw
268343120369 https://haonature.com
function checkLoginState() { FB.getLoginStatus(function(response) { statusChangeCallback(response); }); }

2019/10/18

RT @DrRJKavanagh: Why? A reason was not given, but it is worth noting that the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals was based on "reputational harm" that may be done to living relatives of the perpetrators and witnesses to the lynching. https://t.co/8OO9d78tid

http://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1185372479059103746

沒有留言: